--- Jiri Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you can't get meaning from clean input format then what makes you > think you can handle NL?
Humans seem to get meaning more easily from ambiguous statements than from mathematical formula. Otherwise you are programming, not teaching. > When working on an AGI proof of concept, NL just adds unnecessary > complexity. Do you think you could pass a Turing test without natural language? This is a minimal test for AI, without the added complexity of vision, robotics, speech, etc. How do you propose to measure intelligence in a proof of concept? -- Matt Mahoney, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=60962252-ec59ba
