On 03/06/2008 08:32 AM,, Matt Mahoney wrote:
--- Mark Waser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And thus, we get back to a specific answer to jk's second question. "*US*"
should be assumed to apply to any sufficiently intelligent goal-driven
intelligence. We don't need to define "*us*" because I DECLARE that it
should be assumed to include current day humanity and all of our potential
descendants (specifically *including* our Friendly AIs and any/all other
"mind children" and even hybrids). If we discover alien intelligences, it
should apply to them as well.
... snip ...
- Killing a dog to save a human life is friendly because a human is more
intelligent than a dog.
... snip ...
Mark said that the objects of concern for the AI are "any sufficiently
intelligent goal-driven intelligence[s]", but did not say if or how
different levels of intelligence would be weighted differently by the
AI. So it doesn't yet seem to imply that killing a certain number of
dogs to save a human is friendly.
Mark, how do you intend to handle the friendliness obligations of the AI
towards vastly different levels of intelligence (above the threshold, of
course)?
joseph
-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription:
http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=95818715-a78a9b
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
