Here is an article about RPI's attempt to pass a slightly modified version of the turning test using supercomputers to power their "Rascals" AI algorithm.
http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=206903246&pri ntable=true The one thing I didn't understand was that they said their "Rascals" AI algorithm used a theorem proving architectures. I would assume that that would mean it as based on binary logic, and thus would not be sufficiently flexible to model many human thought processes, which are almost certainly more neural net-like, and thus much more probabilistic. Does anybody have any opinions on that. Ed Porter ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=95818715-a78a9b Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
