Loosemore wrote:
> I hear people enthusing about systems that are filled with holes that were
> discovered decades ago, but still no fix. I read vague speculations and the
> use of buzzwords ('Theory of Mind'!?). I see papers discussing narrow AI
> projects.
I suppose there was all that at AGI-08 ... but there was also a lot
more than that ...
There was more genuine dialogue among folks with different (deeply thought)
perspectives on AGI theory and design, than I've seen in any gathering
(online or F2F) before. This is worth a lot, and I expect this sort
of interaction
to intensify over the next few years...
I'm sorry that sharing insights with others whose perspectives are
different from
your own, is so uninteresting to you, Richard. You are among the most
ardent and extreme dogmatists I have encountered in the AGI field. I think
your perspective is interesting but your degree of confidence in your
correctness and everyone else's wrongness often strikes me as irrational,
given the level of ignorance we all have about this area of study...
ben
-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription:
http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=101455710-f059c4
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
