Steve, Briefly, my thought re a super-medi-wiki is that it only presents theories/contenders rather than definitive answers - and there must be some ratings/voting system.Yes that favours conservative thinking which may become out-of-date. But users will still look for "outsider" ideas, and it should present the latest "kooky" ideas as long as they have some backing. I can't believe there isn't a way round any marketing difficulty. Maybe you should write/talk to Kaiser et al and ask what they would like from such a system. Every medico, presumably, has to research/Google info now and therefore will have all kinds of explicit desires for improvements and some ideal database.But aren't governments or UNO funding any projects here?
------------------------------------------- agi Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=103754539-40ed26 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com