Which "silly" operating system assertions?
Your own words:
but if you actually look at some rather important tech centers like
Silicon Valley, there is not a Windows server in sight. The dominance of
Unix-based systems there is so complete that it is not even a contest any
more. You are apparently under the impression that this is not true,
Now, let's look at your own numbers . . . .
Unix: 1681
Windows: 956
Do you claim that less than two-to-one is not "not a Windows server in
sight"
= = = = =
Or, I'll just go to Dice and try Java and .NET without picking a location
Lookie -- Java 15,434 to .Net 9696
Again, less than two-to-one is radically different from the BS you were
spouting before being challenged.
= = = = =
and again you have to resort to trash-talking like . . .
Just because you are not comfortable with Unix
I've actually done almost as much development under Unix as Windows. I
generally make more money under Unix but, for me personally, the crappy
tools and environments more than offset the extra cash -- and the last thing
I want to do is start an important long-term project with seriously sub-par
tools.
= = = = =
And I love the way that you keep claiming that *I* am rationalizing while,
at the same time, you're conceding the technical arguments and having to
dramatically inflate the market share arguments. It looks to me like you're
the desperate AND self-delusional one to me.
So tell me,
what is plainly obvious to those actually on the ground?
That you have less than a two-to-one market share and it's dwindling? That
technically .Net has blown past you and the gap only shows signs of
widening? That when Mono reaches the next version, you're going to switch?
-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription:
http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=103754539-40ed26
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
