On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 6:44 AM, J Storrs Hall, PhD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you have a fixed-priority utility function, you can't even THINK ABOUT the > choice. Your pre-choice function will always say "Nope, that's bad" and > you'll be unable to change. (This effect is intended in all the RSI stability > arguments.) > > But people CAN make choices like this. To some extent it's the most important > thing we do. So an AI that can't won't be fully human-level -- not a true > AGI.
Even though there is no general agreement on the AGI definition, my impression is that most of the community members understand that: Humans demonstrate GI, but being "fully human-level" is not necessarily required for "true AGI". In some ways, it might even hurt the problem solving abilities. Regards, Jiri Jelinek ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=103754539-40ed26 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
