Re: FW: [agi] WHAT PORTION OF CORTICAL PROCESSES ARE BOUND BY "THE BINDING PROBLEM"?

[Mike Tintner]

A tangential comment here. Looking at this and other related threads I can't 
help thinking: jeez, here are you guys still endlessly arguing about the 
simplest of syllogisms, seemingly unable to progress beyond them. (Don't you 
ever have that feeling?) My impression is that the fault lies with logic 
itself - as soon as you start to apply logic to the real world, even only 
tangentially with talk of "forward" and "backward" or "temporal" 
considerations, you fall into a quagmire of ambiguity, and no one is really 
sure what they are talking about. Even the simplest if p then q logical 
proposition is actually infinitely ambiguous. No?  (Is there a Godel's 
Theorem of logic?) 



-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=108809214-a0d121
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com