>But, I suggest, if you examine them, these are all actually humanoid - clear >adaptations >of human intelligence. Nothing wrong with that. It's just that AGI-ers often >*talk* as if >they are developing, or could develop, a truly non-human intelligence - a >brain that >could think in *fundamentally* different ways from humans.
I think it's an issue of substrate. An AGI built on human-like cognitive principles -- even a total procedurally-accurate reimplementation of a human mind -- running on an electronic rather than organic platform would be a very different kind of intelligence indeed. ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=108809214-a0d121 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
