On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Abram Demski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> by treating terms as sets, >> inheritance as partial subset, and frequency as the extent of partial >> inclusion, > > No. > >> then I don't think it is possible. > > If you read the definitions I attached, you'll see that I am not > taking inheritance to be set-membership. (It is fine if you didn't > take time to read it, time is always limited.) Instead, I've taken > A=>B to be the probability distribution that is average between > p(A=>C|B=>C) and p(C=>B|C=>A).
Yes, I noticed that (which is nice) when reading the document, though I didn't consider that point when writing the email. My mistake. However, I'm still not convinced that it can be done --- see the email I just sent. Pei > --Abram Demski > > > ------------------------------------------- > agi > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now > RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ > Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com > ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=114414975-3c8e69 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
