I meant frequency, sorry "Strength" is a term Pei used for frequency in some old sicsussions...
> If I were taking more the approach Ben suggests, that is, making > reasonable-sounding assumptions and then working forward rather than > assuming NARS and working backward, I would have kept the formula from > last time (justifying it with the argument mentioned above). Probably > this results in a system with many similarities to NARS but differing > in the exact formulas, and in the absence of the constant 'k'. The exact formulas used in NARS are basically heuristics derived based on "endpoint conditions", so replicating those exact formulas is really not important IMO... the key would be replicating their qualitative behavior... ben ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=114414975-3c8e69 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
