On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Stephen Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not really. Although the distinguishing feature of a Lisp syntax tree is a > nested list, and the fact that my composition framework is also a tree does > not make that framework a Lisp family language.
What do you see as the most important differences? I'll certainly grant it's reasonable to not call it Lisp, but it seems to me that it is nonetheless a programming language, in which you express algorithms in the form of syntax trees? ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=117534816-b15a34 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
