John, an impressive effort and wonderful direction, an analytical psychology of the Good in humans is sorely lacking and the focus on human sickness has had a monopoly for way too long and with untold negative consequences for society at large. assuming these meanings are correct (or will be fine tuned to be so at some point), cannot your coding include classes that would prohibit improper uses of such terms, kind of a system of rejecting attempts to mix value judgments and labels?
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:29 AM, John LaMuth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike > > The abstract nouns Honor. Justice. Truth can all be shown > to be objectively based in science of Behaviorism > > http://www.angelfire.com/rnb/fairhaven/behaviorism.html > > as outlined in technically linked schematics > > http://www.angelfire.com/rnb/fairhaven/schematics.html > > and even granted US patent 6587846 > > www.ethicalvalues.com > > Just offering up the latest advances... > > Wittgenstein would be proud ^_^ > > Cordially > > John LaMuth > > www.charactervalues.org > > > * > > GUILT > * > > Previously, you (as reinforcer) have leniently acted in a reinforcing > fashion towards me: overriding my (as procurer) submissive treatment of you. > > But now, I (as personal authority) will *guiltily* act in a submissive > fashion towards you: overruling your lenient treatment of me. > * > > BLAME > * > > Previously, I (as personal authority) have guiltily acted in a submissive > fashion towards you: overriding your (as reinforcer) lenient treatment of > me. > > But now, you (as my personal fol-lower) will *blamefully* act in a lenient > fashion towards me: overruling my (as PA) guilty treatment of you. > * > > HONOR > * > > Previously, you (as my personal follower) have blamefully acted in a > lenient fashion towards me: overriding my (as PA) guilty treatment of you. > > But now, I (as group authority) will *honorably* act in a guilty fashion > towards you: overruling your (as PF) blameful treatment of me. > * > > JUSTICE > * > > Previously, I (as group authority) have honorably acted in a guilty fashion > towards you: overriding your (as PF) blameful treatment of me. > > But now, you (as group representative) will *justly*-blame me: overruling > my (as GA) honorable sense of guilt. > * > > LIBERTY > * > > Previously, you (as group representative) have justly-blamed me: overriding > my (as GA) honorable sense of guilt. > * > > * > > But now, I (as spiritual authority) will honorably act in a *libertarian > *fashion > towards you: overruling your > > just-blaming of me. > * > > HOPE > * > > Previously, I (as spiritual authority) have honorably acted in a > libertarian fashion towards you: overriding your (as GR) just-blaming of me. > > But now, you (as my spiritual disciple) will blamefully-*hope* for > justice: overruling my (as SA) libertarian sense of honor. > * > > FREE WILL > * > > Previously, you (as my spiritual disciple) have blamefully-hoped for > justice: overriding my (as SA) libertarian sense of honor. > > But now, I (as humanitarian authority) will honorably act in a *freely > willed* fashion towards you: overruling your (as SD) blameful-hope for > justice. > * > > TRUTH > * > > Previously, I (as humanitarian authority) have honorably acted in a > freely-willed fashion towards you: overriding your (as SD) blameful hope for > justice. > > But now, you (as representative member of humanity) will justly-hope for > the *truth*: overruling my (as HA) libertarian sense of free will. > * > > EQUALITY > * > > Previously, you (as representative member of humanity) have justly-hoped > for the truth: overriding my (as HA) libertarian sense of free will. > > But now, I (as transcendental authority) will freely-willed act in an* ** > egalitarian* fashion towards you: overruling your (as RH) just-hope for > the truth. > * > > BLISS > * > > Previously, I (as transcendental authority) have freely-willed acted in an > egalitarian fashion towards you: overriding your (as RH) just-hope for the > truth. > > But now, you (as my transcendental follower) will *blissfully* hope for > the truth: overruling my (as TA) egalitarian treatment of you. > > ......... > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Mike Tintner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > *To:* agi@v2.listbox.com > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 25, 2008 10:39 AM > *Subject:* Re: [agi] who is going to build the wittgenstein-ian AI filter > to spot all the intellectual nonsense > > > > Tudor: I agree that there are many better questions to elucidate the > tricks/pitfalls of language. but lets list the biggest time wasters first, > > Er, it's a rather big job. I think you're talking about all abstract nouns. > Time. Space. Honour. Justice. Truth. Realism Beauty. Science. Art. You're > talking IOW about a dimension of language almost as fundamental as adverbs. > > It's worth pursuing the illusions created by the verbal abstractions of > language and the ways we use them - but it's a huge task. > > ------------------------------ > *agi* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> > <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/> | > Modify<https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>Your Subscription > <http://www.listbox.com> > ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=120640061-aded06 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
