Ronald: I didn't have to choose 'Display images' to see your attached picture again. What are you doing? It's fun, but scary.
On 1/9/09, Ronald C. Blue <ronb...@u2ai.us> wrote: >> But how can it dequark the tachyon antimatter containment field? >> Richard Loosemore >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > A model that can answer all questions is defective precisely because it can > do so. > > But in your case matter does not exist except at certain time phases as a > standing opponent process informational system from a zero point energy > point of view. An example is the negative phase oscillon in the matter > picture surrounded by electrons oscilating in and out of existence. > > Oscillon pairs with opposite waves form bonding are very stable. This is > like the Pauli exculsion principle. Only electron pairs with opposite spins > can be in orbit together. This is also true for shaddow matter or the > nucleus of an atom. > > > Emotionally I like the idea that anti-matter is matter moving into the past. > But due to vortex > of energy it looks like negative time but it is just like as an old wagon > wheel in a black and white movie looking like it is > colorized and going backwards. 3D is an illusion. > > The above picture supports Anyons and "topological charge" proposed by > Frank Wilczek. > > ((Recommended reading from New Scientist. > Anyons: The breakthrough quantum computing needs? > a.. 01 October 2008 by Don Monroe > b.. Magazine issue 2676. Subscribe and get 4 free issues. > c.. For similar stories, visit the Quantum World Topic Guide > Read full article > Continue reading page |1 |2 |3 > WE SHOULD have known there was something in it when Microsoft got involved. > Back in 2003, the software giant began sponsoring a small research effort > with an interest in an abstruse area of physics known as the fractional > quantum Hall effect. The effect, which has been the subject of two Nobel > prizes, involves the delicate manipulation of electrons inside semiconductor > crystals. What could a software company like Microsoft hope to gain from > funding this research? > > The answer is now clear. This year, we have seen the first indications that > this strange and abstract phenomenon could bring us a revolution in > computing. "We have good reason to believe that, if we can do anything [with > this], we can do a lot," says Michael Freedman of Microsoft-sponsored > Station Q research group in Santa Barbara, California. > > Microsoft is interested because an ability to manipulate the fractional > quantum Hall effect promises a unique and powerful way to process > information using the resources of the subatomic world. Down at the level of > photons, electrons, protons and atoms, matter behaves very differently from > what we are used to. These quantum objects can be in two places at once, for > example, or spin clockwise and anticlockwise at the same time. This > phenomenon, known as superposition, is entirely foreign to the way things > work in the ordinary "classical" world. > > It was realised years ago that superposition provides an opportunity for > information processing, and researchers have been working for decades to > build a "quantum computer" that exploits it. Encode a 0 as the clockwise > spin of an electron and 1 as the anticlockwise spin, for example, and > superposition gives you a kind of "buy one, get one free" special offer, > with both of these binary digits appearing on the same particle. Process one > of these quantum bits, or "qubits", and you get two answers. If you could > create an array of electrons in superposition, it would be possible to use > this phenomenon for superfast processing. In principle, qubits enable huge > sequences of binary digits to be encoded and processed with much less > computational effort than would be needed in the classical world. > > The thing is, while theorists drew up the blueprint for a quantum computer > more than two decades ago, we still don't have one. That is largely because > of a problem called decoherence. Quantum superpositions are notoriously > delicate. If the electron in a superposition state is disturbed - by > something in its environment such as a little heat or a stray > electromagnetic field, say - the superposition will collapse and lose the > double helping of information it was carrying. > > Follow the trail > This is where the fractional quantum Hall effect can help. Quantum particles > are conventionally divided into two types: fermions, such as the electron; > and bosons, such as the photon. Then, about 25 years ago, researchers such > as Frank Wilczek of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology began to > realise there might be a third type. > > The idea came from considering whether you can tell two identical particles > apart from each other. Imagine a quantum version of the magic cup game much > beloved by dodgy street magicians. Two photons, marked A and B, are hidden > under two cups sitting on a table. The magician swaps the cups around on the > table top at a furious pace. When the swaps are finished, would there be any > way to tell, without lifting the cups, which was which? > > For photons, the answer is no: swapping their positions does not leave a > record on their quantum states. The same trick done with electrons might > leave a mark, but only after an odd number of swaps. With one swap, the > quantum state of the electrons gains a "topological charge", rather in the > way a balloon dragged along a carpet gains an electrostatic charge, but if > it is followed by a second swap that topological charge is lost. > > Wilczek realised, though, that quantum laws allow another possibility - as > long as there are only two dimensions. That restriction arises because > swapping positions is equivalent to rotating the particles clockwise or > anticlockwise. If you have three dimensions, shifting your perspective - > looking from under the table, for instance - can make opposite rotations > look identical; only in 2D would they always be distinguishable. > > Wilczek reasoned that if you could confine the game - including the > watchers - to two dimensions, perhaps a new class of particle, neither > fermions nor bosons, but something in between, could retain a topological > charge. In the highly artificial scenario of strange new particles that > exist only in 2D - Wilczek called them anyons - a quantum trace of the > particles' relative motions would remain. > > This is the key to "topological quantum computing". We have known for a very > long time that knots and braids - which are the result of swapping the > relative positions of threads - offer a way to encode numbers: that is how > the ancient Incas kept records. Likewise, swapping the relative positions of > quantum particles can encode numbers for quantum processing.))) > > > > > ------------------------------------------- > agi > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now > RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ > Modify Your Subscription: > https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com > ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=123753653-47f84b Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
