Allegedly, Human Point Two (via Quazie) wrote:
> Human Point Two CFJs on the following Statement: "Human Point Two
> bears the patent title Minister Without Portfolio"
>
> Human Point Two submits the following arguments for the CFJ:
> "Human Point Two once did bear the patent title of Minister Without
> Portfolio. At that point it was a person. Now that Human Point Two
> has once again gained its Personhood it should regain its patent
> title"
If this resulted in a CFJ, I submit the following gratuitous
arguments and evidence for it:
Gratuitous arguments: Human Point Two is not a partnership. (A
partnership must devolve its obligations onto its partners; but
the contract's text implies that the Partners may satisfy its
obligations, but not that they must satisfy its obligations.)
Therefore it is not a person.
Evidence:
{{{
3. Human Point Two may incur obligations, rights, and privileges
under the Rules of Agora. The Partners may act on behalf of Human
Point Two to satisfy such obligations and to exercise such rights
and privileges, as permitted by this agreement.
}}}
--
ais523
