ais523 wrote:
> Allegedly, Human Point Two (via Quazie) wrote:
>> Human Point Two CFJs on the following Statement: "Human Point Two
>> bears the patent title Minister Without Portfolio"
>>
>> Human Point Two submits the following arguments for the CFJ:
>> "Human Point Two once did bear the patent title of Minister Without
>> Portfolio. At that point it was a person. Now that Human Point Two
>> has once again gained its Personhood it should regain its patent
>> title"
>
> If this resulted in a CFJ, I submit the following gratuitous
> arguments and evidence for it:
>
> Gratuitous arguments: Human Point Two is not a partnership. (A
> partnership must devolve its obligations onto its partners; but
> the contract's text implies that the Partners may satisfy its
> obligations, but not that they must satisfy its obligations.)
> Therefore it is not a person.
>
> Evidence:
> {{{
> 3. Human Point Two may incur obligations, rights, and privileges
> under the Rules of Agora. The Partners may act on behalf of Human
> Point Two to satisfy such obligations and to exercise such rights
> and privileges, as permitted by this agreement.
> }}}
Counter-evidence:
5. The Partners shall ensure that Human Point Two obeys the Rules of
Agora to the maximum possible extent.
