On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 07:17 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I call for the judgment on the following:
>
> "The ratification of the Short Logical Ruleset CAN cause the text of a
> rule to change."
>
> Argument: Rule 105 takes precedence over Rule 1551 and claims the sole
> authority for changes to the Rules; thus ratification of the Ruleset
> CANNOT change the Rules and is wholly ineffective.
Argument: Rule 1551 is an instrument, and a therefore rule 105 allows it
to make rules changes where permitted by rules other than rule 105, and
rule 1551 permits itself to make changes. (Note that there is no
'explicitly' involved here.)
--
ais523
