I withdraw the previous version of this proposal.
Proposal: Tweak veracity
(AI = 1.7, please)
Pavitra is a co-author of this proposal.
Amend Rule 591 (Inquiry Cases) by replacing the paragraph beginning
with "An inquiry case has a judicial question on veracity," with
this text:
An inquiry case has a judicial question on veracity, which is
always applicable. The valid judgements for this question are
as follows, based on the veracity on the statement at the time
the inquiry case was initiated:
* TRUE, appropriate if the statement was factually and logically
true
* FALSE, appropriate if the statement was factually and logically
false
* UNDECIDABLE, appropriate if the statement was logically
undecidable or otherwise not capable of being accurately
described as either true or false
* FLOYD, appropriate if the statement logically could have been
consistently described as either true or false
* UNDETERMINED, appropriate if the statement is nonsensical or
too vague, or if the information available to the judge is
insufficient to determine which of the TRUE, FALSE, UNDECIDABLE,
and FLOYD judgements is appropriate; however, uncertainty as
to how to interpret or apply the rules cannot constitute
insufficiency of information for this purpose
* IRRELEVANT, appropriate if the veracity of the statement is
not relevant to the game
[See ftp://ftp.nvg.ntnu.no/pub/frc/29 for the source of FLOYD]
