On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 9:47 PM, Pavitra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 23 October 2008 04:10:14 pm Elliott Hird wrote: >> * FLOYD, appropriate if the statement was logically capable >> of being described as either true or false with equal accuracy > Accuracy may be equally "not much" (.01==.01). Probably better to say > something like: > * FLOYD, appropriate if the statement logically could have been > consistently described as either true or false
If the rules are ambiguous and I call a CFJ to try to resolve the ambiguity, I don't want "Yep, that's ambiguous, all right"; I want a resolution. --Warrigal of Escher
