On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 11:25 -0500, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > I judge CFJs 2276-78 TRUE. > > None of the purported attempts to resolve the Agoran Decisions to > adopt the proposals in question contained an accurate tally of the > valid ballots cast, and thus they all fail to meet R208's requirements > to resolve those decisions. > > R2156 defines a player's voting limit on an ordinary decision as eir > caste at the start of its voting period. At the beginning of the > voting periods in question, ehird's caste was epsilon, and thus eir > voting limit was 1/2 for being in the chokey, rounded up to 1. Any > purported spending of notes to increase eir voting limit on these > decisions may or may not have instantaneously increased it at the > moment of spending, but evaluated at the end of the voting period or > the time of resolution the R2156 definition must be used.
I intend to appeal this with 2 support. Increasing a player's voting limit on a decision causes it to be higher than it otherwise would have been. Eir voting limit was 1, increased by 50 (or however many it was, I can't remember offhand). -- ais523
