On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 10:40 -0600, Pavitra wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Elliott Hird
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 20 Nov 2008, at 16:31, Alex Smith wrote:
> >
> >> I intend to appeal this with 2 support. Increasing a player's voting
> >> limit on a decision causes it to be higher than it otherwise would have
> >> been. Eir voting limit was 1, increased by 50 (or however many it was, I
> >> can't remember offhand).
> >
> > I support.
>
> I also support. The judgement of these CFJs should at least have
> addressed this line of argument.
>
And with 2 support, I initiate the above-quoted appeal.
--
ais523
