Having received the necessary supoprt, I send the message indicated below on behalf of the panel indicated below. -Goethe
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008, Alex Smith wrote: > On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 11:03 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Ed Murphy wrote: >>> ============================ Appeal 2303a ============================ >>> Panelist: Goethe >>> Panelist: ais523 >>> Panelist: BobTHJ >>> ======================================================================== >> >> I intend to send the following message on behalf of this panel, with the >> support of (ais523 && BobTHJ) or ((ais523 || BobTHJ) && Murphy): >> >> One panelist (Goethe) notes that we have successfully used delimiters >> to reasonably unambiguously refer to "" and know who was meant; however >> this disagrees with another panelist (BobTHJ's) appellant arguments so >> we merely REMAND for further pondering, perhaps for the judge to take a >> poll on how many find it confusing, or perhaps to decide, as the right >> to choose one's own nickname is tradition and not rule, that the true >> nickname includes the delimiters. However, it's important to note >> that the Appellant's comments about the Patent Title "" may not be an >> argument worth making, as the patent title in question is not itself >> defined in the rules. > Hmm... after reading that I have a huge urge to support with a typo in. > I supoprt. > -- > ais523 > >
