On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 4:43 PM, comex <[email protected]> wrote: > Destroying something is not altering it. While it's possible to word > destruction as a change to 'existence', saying this is awkward and > unnatural. You wouldn't usually call 'existence' an aspect of > something.
I call for judgement on the statement: * Rule 2140 exists. Arguments: See above.
