On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: > Seems to be a part of Zefram's mass generalizations. Although even > with the distinction, when something ceases to be a rule, it pretty > much no longer exists in legal Agoran terms (at least in normal > circumstances), so it's hard to say that's not legally "destroying" > it.
I transfer one coin to the entity formerly known as Rule 2184. :P
