comex wrote: > On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Ed Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: >> As permitted by the rule created by Proposal 6130, I cause Rule 2223 >> (Win by Junta) to amend itself by appending this paragraph: > > This fails because it is unclear whether this is supposed to take > effect before or after the resolution of the proposals (which > generally ends with the 'text of adopted proposals' section).
It clearly takes effect after. "Text of adopted proposals" is not required by the rules, it's simply a courtesy. > I nominate myself for Assessor. I nominate myself for Assessor. Surely your history of scamming this office is at least as bad as mine. >> Murphy, Goethe, and OscarMeyr CAN cause this rule to make >> arbitrary rule changes by announcement. >> >> I spend Ab Ab to destroy one of my Rests. >> >> This is a win announcement stating that Murphy, Goethe, and OscarMeyr >> satisfy the Winning Condition of Dictatorship. > > A win announcement is not required for a Win by Junta; instead, the > winning condition is satisfied as soon as the rule comes to contain > the dictatorship text. Note that this means Murphy did not win > because, at the time the rule came to contain that text, e satisfied > the Losing Condition of owning one or more Rests. Razzam frazzam. Not only that, but Win by Junta is Powerful enough that I could have used it to destroy my Rests for free.
