Charles Reiss wrote: > On 4/11/09 8:23 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: >> Sean Hunt wrote: >> >>> I intend, without objection, to ratify the most recently published >>> Registrar's report (as of the time I perform the action) provided it has >>> not had a CoE or inquiry case levied against it. The scope will be to >>> ratify the document in its entirety as being a complete and accurate >>> Registrar's report. >>> >>> This is intended to test the scope of the ratification rules; there is >>> no scam behind this. Some people might be irritated, but that's about >>> it. Feel free to object; it's not a big deal, though I would like to see >>> it happen. >>> >>> -coppro >>> >> Someone pointed out that that may not count as intent, so I'll just >> repost it as this: >> >> I withdraw my intent to perform the above-quoted action. >> >> I intend, without objection, to ratify the most recently published >> Registrar's report (as of the time of the action). The scope will be to >> ratify the document in its entirety as being a complete and accurate >> Registrar's report. >> > I object. > > -woggle >
Eh, it's too much for me to bother with setting up the future report thing (I've talked to woggle in ##nomic about this, e's adamant about not allowing it to ratify future documents, it's probably a good idea anyways). I intend, without objection, to ratify the most recently published Registrar's report (as of the time of this message). The scope will be to ratify the document in its entirety as being a complete and accurate Registrar's report. I pledge not to perform the above dependent action if the report has had a CoE levied against it and that CoE has not been denied by the Registrar. This pledge terminates in two weeks.
