On Sat, 2009-05-02 at 09:39 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: > I publish a Notice of Violation alleging that ais523 violated Rule > 2230 (Notices of Violation), committing the Class-4 Crime of Libel, > twenty times by publishing the Notices of Violation in step 1 > above. (This is Contested because a Crime is named.) I initiate a > criminal case pertaining to this Notice of Violation.
Arguments: As far as I'm aware, the notices were all legal due to a loophole in the NoV rules. The Libel rule makes knowingly issuing an NoV with incorrect information illegal. However, all the information is correct; the identity of the Accused is; the Crime number is; and the action and Rule involved in the alleged crime are. The point here is that the crimes have indeed been alleged (I first alleged them in a private email to Murphy); reporting the fact that they have been alleged is, therefore, correct. That I am reporting the fact that it's alleged as an NoV is therefore legal; and that coppro judged the resulting CfJs GUILTY is slightly unusual, but we've cleaned up all the mess through appeal now. -- ais523
