On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Alex Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 2009-05-02 at 22:32 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: >> Can someone explain why e doesn't need a lot of support to do this? I >> don't see how the first one is not a "valid, un-closed NoV published >> by the same player earlier that week" as per R2230. Though there has >> to be something as surely somone in that big a scam has to have >> noticed such a flaw. > It's possible to publish an NoV by sending it to a public forum, no > matter what lower-power rules think on the matter. Rules 101 and 478, > both power-3, give us the right of participation in the fora. And > publishing NoVs is certainly a legitimate form of participation (unlike, > e.g. lying). > > -- > ais523 > >
Umm... no? Participation is not the same thing as completely uninhibited participation. I CFJ on the following sentence. ais523, Murphy, and coppro won the game on 02 May, 2009.
