On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 11:32 PM, Alex Smith <ais...@bham.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 23:21 -0700, Rodlen wrote: > > Okay, I hereby consent to that rest destruction stuff. > Oh dear, now we're going to have an argument about what "unanimous > Support of the panel's other members" in rule 2157 means. Just to make > things unambiguous, could you "intend, with unanimous panel support, to > destroy 4 rests in ais523's possession"? > > -- > ais523 > > I intend, with unanimous panel support, to destroy 4 rests in ais523's possession. ...Wow. -- --Rodlen