On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 2:09 AM, Alex Smith <ais...@bham.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 23:02 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> ========================= Criminal Case 2480 =========================
>> Appeal: 2480a
>> Decision: REMAND
>>
>> Judge: Taral
>> Judgement: NOT GUILTY
>> ========================================================================
>
> I remind the appeals panel in CFJ 2480a ({Wooble, Rodlen, Tiger}) that
> they CAN and SHALL destroy the 4 rests I own:
I intend, with the Support of Rodlen and Tiger, to cause the panel to
send the following message:
{{
We destroy 4 rests in ais523's possession.
}}
I support any previous intents by panelists in this case that I've missed.
