> I meant 6339 - 6343, of course. In case the previous attempt was
> unsuccessful, I resolve those decisions now.
In case both these attempts were unsuccessful due to the usual
marks being omitted from this section:
>> 6339 D1 2.0 coppro Execution of Intent-on-Behalf
>> 6340 D1 3.0 G. Permission to Ratify
>> 6341 D1 2.0 G. s/support/object
>> 6342 D1 2.0 Quazie Prop2
>> 6343 D1 2.0 coppro They're Proposals Too!
then I resolve them as follows: 6339 and 6343 were REJECTED, the
rest were ADOPTED.
>> 6339 6340 6341 6342 6343
>>
>> ais523 A F A P A
>> coppro F F P F P
>> c-walker A F F F A
>> G. A F F F A
>> Murphy A F F F A
>> Pavitra A F F F A
>> Quazie A F F F A
>> Rodlen F P F F A
>> Tiger P F F F A
>> woggle A F A A A
>> Wooble A F F A A
>>
>> AI 2 3 2 2 2
>> VI 0.25 *U* 4 4 0
>> F/A 2/8 10/0 8/2 8/2 0/10
>>
>> Quorum 9 9 9 9 9
>> Voters 11 11 11 11 11
>>
>>
>> Text of adopted proposals:
>>
>>
>> }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
>>
>> Proposal 6340 (Democratic, AI=3.0, Interest=1) by G.
>> Permission to Ratify
>>
>> Amend Rule 2202 (Ratification Without Objection) by replacing:
>>
>> A player SHALL NOT knowingly use or announce intent to use
>> Ratification Without Objection to ratify a (prior to
>> ratification) incorrect document when a corrected document could
>> be produced with reasonable effort.
>>
>> with:
>>
>> A player SHALL NOT knowingly use or announce intent to use
>> Ratification Without Objection to ratify a (prior to
>> ratification) incorrect document when a corrected document could
>> be produced with reasonable effort, unless the general nature of
>> the document's error and reason for ratifying it is clearly
>> and plainly described in the announcement of intent.
>>
>>
>> }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
>>
>> Proposal 6341 (Democratic, AI=2.0, Interest=1) by G.
>> s/support/object
>>
>> Amend Rule 1607 (The Promotor) by replacing the sentence beginning
>> "A player CAN flip a specified proposal to Distributable" with
>> the following sentence:
>>
>> A player CAN flip a specified proposal to Distributable by
>> spending 1 Note, or without Objection.
>>
>>
>> }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
>>
>> Proposal 6342 (Democratic, AI=2.0, Interest=1) by Quazie
>> Prop2
>>
>> Create a new rule entitled 'Officer's Proposals' with the following text:
>> "Any proposal submitted as part of an officer's duties has its
>> Distributability flipped to Distributable upon entering the Proposal
>> Pool."
>>
>
>
