On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Jonatan
Kilhamn<[email protected]> wrote:
> I intend to deputise for the Janitor to publish the following proposal:
>
> Retracting proposals cleanup
> AI=3, II=0
> ((
> Amend Rule 106 by replacing the following text:
> (
> The author (syn. proposer) of a proposal is the player
> who submitted it. The author of a proposal may remove it from
> the Pool by announcement. A player CAN remove a proposal e
> authored from the Proposal Pool by announcement.
> )
> with the following text:
> (
> The author (syn. proposer) of a proposal is the player
> who submitted it. The author of a proposal CAN and MAY
> remove it from the Pool by announcement.
> )
> ))
I CFJ on "A proposal was added to the Pool as a result of Tiger
publishing the above-quoted message."
Arguments: R106 says, in part:
A player CAN create a proposal by publishing ("submitting") a
body of text with a clear indication that it is intended to
become a proposal, which places the proposal in the Proposal
Pool.
In the above message, Tiger published a body of text, and clearly
indicated that e intends it (at a later time) to become a proposal. On
some level, therefore, the body of text "is intended to become a
proposal", which seems to meet R106's standard.
