2009/6/11 Geoffrey Spear <[email protected]>: > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Jonatan > Kilhamn<[email protected]> wrote: >> I intend to deputise for the Janitor to publish the following proposal: >> >> Retracting proposals cleanup >> AI=3, II=0 >> (( >> Amend Rule 106 by replacing the following text: >> ( >> The author (syn. proposer) of a proposal is the player >> who submitted it. The author of a proposal may remove it from >> the Pool by announcement. A player CAN remove a proposal e >> authored from the Proposal Pool by announcement. >> ) >> with the following text: >> ( >> The author (syn. proposer) of a proposal is the player >> who submitted it. The author of a proposal CAN and MAY >> remove it from the Pool by announcement. >> ) >> )) > > I CFJ on "A proposal was added to the Pool as a result of Tiger > publishing the above-quoted message." > > Arguments: R106 says, in part: > > A player CAN create a proposal by publishing ("submitting") a > body of text with a clear indication that it is intended to > become a proposal, which places the proposal in the Proposal > Pool. > > In the above message, Tiger published a body of text, and clearly > indicated that e intends it (at a later time) to become a proposal. On > some level, therefore, the body of text "is intended to become a > proposal", which seems to meet R106's standard. > Huh. I withdraw the deputisation intent until this has resolved.
-- -Tiger
