comex wrote:
> I become Hanging.
>
> I call an inquiry case on the following statement, submitting it to
> the Justiciar and setting an Interest Index of 3:
> * 1 + 1 = 2
>
> As Justiciar, I accept this case and assign it the ID number 2617.
> I assign Tanner Swett as judge of CFJ 2617.
>
> I call an inquiry case on each of the following statements, submitting
> it to the Justiciar and setting an Interest Index of 3:
> * ais523 is party to at least one private contract containing the word
> "inferences".
> * Wooble is party to at least one private contract containing the word
> "inferences".
>
> As Justiciar, I accept these cases and assign them the ID numbers 2618
> and 2619, respectively.
> I rotate the bench.
> I assign ais523 as judge of CFJ 2618.
> I assign Wooble as judge of CFJ 2619.
>
> I become Hovering.
This rotation was apparently legal. The standing judges were:
allispaul (rank 2)
c. (hanging)
coppro (rank 2)
c-walker (rank 1, hovering)
ehird (rank 1)
Rodlen (rank 1)
Taral (hovering, well-qualified for 2620, thus poorly
qualified for 2618-19)
and cases other than 2618-19 were n/a because c. was not required to
assign a judge to them, I was.
Proposal: No early rotation
(AI = 1.5, please)
Amend Rule 1871 (The Standing Court) by replacing this text:
The CotC CAN rotate the bench (change all sitting players to
standing) by announcement, but SHALL NOT do so unless there is a
judicial case to which e is obliged to assign a judge, all
entities qualified to be so assigned are poorly qualified, and e
immediately afterwards (in the same announcement) assigns a
judge to that case.
with this text:
The CotC CAN rotate the bench (change all sitting players to
standing) by announcement, but SHALL NOT do so unless, of the
judicial cases requiring assignment:
a) no entity is well-qualified to be assigned to any of them;
b) e immediately afterwards (in the same announcement) assigns
a judge to at least one of them.
I spend Ab to make the above proposal distributable.
