comex wrote: > C-walker wrote: >> CFJ, II 3: When a Rule is repealed, its Power is set to 0. > > FALSE; it remains a Power-N entity which is no longer a rule (and > therefore is useless). See R105.
I was reading R105 when I came up with the CFJ. I was wondering whether there was a mechanism or precedent elsewhere which set the power to 0. I retract the above quoted CFJ. -- C-walker A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
