On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[email protected]> wrote:
> This distribution of proposals 6790-6810
> initiates the Agoran Decisions on whether to adopt them.  The eligible
> voters are the active players at the time of this distribution, and
> the vote collector is the Assessor. The valid options on each decision
> are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote). Each proposal is
> hereby assigned the corresponding ID number listed with it.
>
> NUM  C I AI  SUBMITTER           TITLE
> 6790 R 1 2.0 Wooble              Assumption Makes This Unnecessary
FOR

> 6791 P 1 1.0 omd                 Contestification
If 6792 has enough unconditional votes FOR to pass, regardless of what
happens with conditional votes on 6792, then FOR, otherwise AGAINST

> 6792 P 1 2.0 omd                 Contests
FOR

> 6793 R 1 2.0 Wooble              shorter speedup counterproposal
FOR

> 6794 P 0 1.0 coppro              Restore White
AGAINST [WTF?]

> 6795 P 0 1.0 coppro              Repair White
FOR

> 6796 P 1 2.0 coppro              The Robot
FOR

> 6797 P 0 1.0 omd                 More clarification
FOR

> 6798 P 1 1.0 coppro              Bitrot
FOR

> 6799 G 0 1.0 Keba                Win by Respect
FOR

> 6800 P 1 1.5 coppro              Distribution
FOR

> 6801 R 0 1.0 Wooble              No One Wants To Do It
AGAINST [I'm planning to assume it soon]

> 6802 G 1 1.0 Murphy              Yoink!
FOR

> 6803 G 0 1.0 Murphy              Low altitude
FOR

> 6804 G 1 2.0 Murphy              Energize new players
FOR

> 6805 G 1 1.0 Keba                Props should be important!
AGAINST [Freely giving away should be restricted... too easy to give
someone a win like this.. maybe in return for other hypothetical
assets?]

> 6806 P 1 3.1 coppro              Ratification misstep
PRESENT [What's this for?]

> 6807 P 1 3.0 coppro              Complete Induction
FOR, although I do want to be sure that "appropriate" also implies non-0

> 6808 P 1 1.0 coppro              Super Robot Powers
AGAINST. Make it conditional on "robot" being defined by the rules

> 6809 P 1 3.0 omd                 OK Go
PRESENT [There seem to be a lot of proposals this week...]

> 6810 P 1 2.0 omd                 Make erg accumulation somewhat easier
FOR

Reply via email to