On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, omd wrote: > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffsp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > >> I contest this. Now, I publish this NoV: > >> a. omd. > >> b. issuing an NoV with knowingly incorrect information (it is painfully > >> clear that by saying "hi I'm Bucky" that Bucky did not in fact select > >> the nickname "John Smith" - none but the lowest level of hurried moron > >> could call this information correct). > >> c. Rule 2230. > >> d. Class-4 Crime of Libel. > > > > This is valid NoV 82. > > CFJ: The quoted NoV is valid. > Arguments: As I meant to respond to the publication with (but > apparently I forgot to hit send): > > I hereby identify that this NoV is invalid because it doesn't include > identify an action, just a description of a hypothetical action that, > in my opinion, very poorly describes my recent act of NoV publication.
Gratuitous: the (alleged) NoV statement quoted above was a reply that included a quote of omd's message that contained the alleged violating action, so in context it was quite clear. -G.
