On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 8:29 PM, ais523 <callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > * or commonly referred to as xxxx/yy > The second is impossible in the current ruleset; the third isn't, as > although no rule is currently commonly referred to with a name of that > form, that could change without any ruleset amendments.
I intend to call for reconsideration with two support, as this is highly unlikely.
