On 01/14/2012 08:31 PM, omd wrote: > On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 8:29 PM, ais523 <callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >> * or commonly referred to as xxxx/yy >> The second is impossible in the current ruleset; the third isn't, as >> although no rule is currently commonly referred to with a name of that >> form, that could change without any ruleset amendments. > > I intend to call for reconsideration with two support, as this is > highly unlikely.
I support. Common usage is that the first sense is meant.
