On Mon, 27 Feb 2012, FKA441344 wrote: > Case 3169: > The Prisoner is an entity defined by the rules, which acts when the > rules say it acts. Per case 2196b, phrases in the rules generally mean > something rather than nothing. Therefore, when the rules caused The > Prisoner to be a player, they implicitly caused it to explicitly > consent to become a player. I judge this case TRUE.
I intend to request reconsideration with 2 support. "implicitly caused it to explicitly" is as much doublespeak nonsense as "war means peace". -G.
