I support.
On Feb 27, 24 Heisei, at 7:54 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > On Mon, 27 Feb 2012, FKA441344 wrote: >> Case 3169: >> The Prisoner is an entity defined by the rules, which acts when the >> rules say it acts. Per case 2196b, phrases in the rules generally mean >> something rather than nothing. Therefore, when the rules caused The >> Prisoner to be a player, they implicitly caused it to explicitly >> consent to become a player. I judge this case TRUE. > > I intend to request reconsideration with 2 support. "implicitly caused > it to explicitly" is as much doublespeak nonsense as "war means peace". > -G. > > >
