On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 16:58 +0100, FKA441344 wrote: > Recent events (UTC) > TIME EVENT > ####################### > Tue 28 Feb 17:39 ehird deregisters.
I judge CFJ 3164 GUILTY, pretty uncontroversially. Calculating a reasonable punishment is harder, though, because ehird is currently a non-player, and what e committed is (by definition) a very serious breach of the rules, despite being an inconsequential one. DISCHARGE is inappropriate; FINE is impossible as (from a quick search of the rules) there are currently no finable assets (and especially none that could be fined from non-players); EXILE seems a bit much because of the two-month timeout, although I would definitely use it if the timeout were shorter; TIME OUT would cause something impossible to happen (increasing the value of a nonexistent timer). Giving COMMUNITY SERVICE or APOLOGY would violate rule 101, as far as I can tell, due to harassing non-players. Although I think I appropriately could give an exile judgement, that would seem ridiculously harsh in the circumstances; whereas with timing out, we'll at least have an interesting followup case. The duration should be set high so it has some chance of overlapping with ehird being a player, and to reflect the severity of the crime. Thus, I judge CFJ 3164 GUILTY/TIME OUT 21. -- ais523
