The statement of CFJ 3240 is messy, and therefore considered inaccurate (i.e. false; accuracy refers to truth when applied to statements and not, for example, projectiles), which would imply that the statement of this CFJ is true. However, the statement of this CFJ is also messy, and therefore considered false. However, the statement that the statement of this CFJ is false is also messy, so it cannot be accurately described as false. It also cannot be accurately described as true, so I judge UNDECIDABLE.
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > I change all sitting players to standing. > > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3244 > > ============================== CFJ 3244 ============================== > > It would be ILLEGAL for a player to publish a message whose body > consisted solely of the text "I intend, without objection, to > ratify the statement of CFJ 3240.". > > ======================================================================== > > Caller: Murphy > > Judge: FKA441344 > Judgement: > > ======================================================================== > > History: > > Called by Murphy: 06 Jul 2012 14:00:11 GMT > Assigned to omd: 06 Jul 2012 14:02:43 GMT > omd recused: 06 Jul 2012 23:14:11 GMT > Assigned to FKA441344: (as of this message) > > ======================================================================== > > Gratuitous Arguments by G.: > > This phrase: > For the purposes of the rules, messy statements are considered > inaccurate and incorrect regardless of their truth value. > does not make it clear if the TRUE/FALSE/UNDECIDABLE of court cases > should be applied to the "truth value" of the messy statement (which > would still allow for UNDECIDABLE) or to its deemed inaccurateness. > > ========================================================================
