TtttPF On Jul 20, 2017 08:27, wrote:
> But nobody else created them. You're only claiming they did. I point my > finger at CB for violation of No Faking. E can't possibly believe e can > force otger players to create tokens. > > On Jul 20, 2017 08:25, "Cuddle Beam" <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I'd prefer to spend a CFJ slot be spent but it's not an urgent CFJ at >> all. I'm be up for retracting it if you pledge that you'll resubmit it when >> the CFJ queue is empty enough (and if the economy eventually makes CFJs >> have a price, I'll refund you). >> >> The reasoning is a bit offshore, though, definitely. But a Trust Token >> that someone else has created *is* still "a Trust Token", after all. >> >> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 3:12 PM, Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> >> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 15:07 +0200, Cuddle Beam wrote: >>> > Note R2452: "Any player can issue a Trust Token to another person by >>> > announcement." >>> > >>> > Be a TrustToken[A, B] a Trust Token such that player A would issue to >>> > player B if A posted a message of "I grant a Trust Token to B", where >>> B is >>> > Player B's name, to a-b; >>> > >>> > Once, for each player except Murphy, I issue a Trust Token[A, B] to >>> Murphy, >>> > where A is that player and B is Murphy, to Murphy. >>> >>> I don't think it holds up to logical scrutiny (or any kind of common >>> sense) that you can create something in such a way that it was created >>> by someone else. Or to put it another way, it's impossible to create an >>> object with an arbitrary history, because history doesn't work like >>> that. >>> >>> Will you retract the CFJ, or do I really have to assign it? >>> >>> -- >>> ais523 >>> >> >>
