I spend a shiny to CFJ "In the below-quoted message, PSS resolved an Agoran
Decision".

Arguments: See also CFJ 3576 about revisions of reports. In this case, PSS
said e is republishing the below as a revision, but what does that mean?
With a report, there is no action except for publication, but with a
decision resolution, there is an action (namely, resolving the decisions).
Compare and contrast rule 2201, which specifically mentions revisions, and
rule 208, which sets out conditions for a decision resolution. Clearly,
PSS's first resolution was wholly INVALID with consequences such as
invalidating the subsequent claim of the reward for resolution.

Is this second one supposed to resolve the decision correctly, or merely to
correct the previously published document? I argue that this is
sufficiently unclear as to fail the test required for "by announcement",
meaning that e does not actually resolve the decision in this message.

On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 at 14:26 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote:

> That is correct. I republish the below as a revision:
>
>
> I resolve the decision(s) to adopt proposal(s) 7923-7929 below.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> [This notice resolves the Agoran decisions of whether to adopt the
>  following proposals.  For each decision, the options available to
>  Agora are ADOPTED (*), REJECTED (x), and FAILED QUORUM (!). If a
>  decision's voting period is still ongoing, I end it immediately
>  before resolving it and after resolving the previous decision.]
>
> ID     Author(s)     AI   Title                         Pender      Pend
> fee
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 7923x  Gaelan         1.0  Another Economy Fix Attempt  Gaelan      1 AP
> 7924*  Aris, [1]      3.0  Contracts v8                 Aris        1 sh.
> 7925*  Aris, Alexis   3.0  Safety Regulations v2        Aris        1 AP
> 7926x  Alexis         3.0  Deregulation                 Alexis      1 AP
> 7927*  V.J. Rada, G.  2.0  Estate Auction Fix           V.J. Rada   1 sh.
> 7928*  G.             3.0  no we can't                  G.          1 AP
> 7929x  V.J. Rada      1.0  Consumerism                  V.J. Rada   1 sh.
>
>
>
>
> |        | 7923 | 7924 | 7025 | 7926 | 7927 | 7928 | 7929 |
> |--------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+
> |Alexis  | AA   | PP   | FF   | FF   | FF   | FF   | PP   |
> |Aris    | A    | F    | F    | A    | F    | F    | A    |
> |ATMunn  | A    | F    | F    | A    | F    | F    | A    |
> |G       | A    | F    | F    | F    | F    | F    | A    |
> |nichdel | A    | F    | P    | P    | F    | F    | P    |
> |PSS     | A    | F    | F    | A    | F    | F    | F    |
> |Trigon  | F    | F    | P    | P    | P    | P    | A    |
> |VJ Rada | F    | F    | F    | F    | F    | F    | F    |
> |--------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+
> |F/A     | 2/7  | 7/0  | 7/0  | 4/3  | 8/0  | 8/0  | 3/4  |
> |AI      | 1.0  | 3.0  | 3.0  | 3.0  | 2.0  | 3.0  | 1.0  |
> |V       | 8    | 8    | 8    | 8    | 8    | 8    | 8    |
> |Q       | 5    | 5    | 5    | 5    | 5    | 5    | 5    |
> |P       | F    | T    | T    | F    | T    | T    | F    |
>
> On 10/22/2017 09:40 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> >
> > CoE: My votes count double as PM
> > On Sun, Oct 22, 2017, 08:31 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus,
> > <p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> > <mailto:p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     I resolve the decision(s) to adopt proposal(s) 7923-7929 below.
> >
> >
>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >     [This notice resolves the Agoran decisions of whether to adopt the
> >      following proposals.  For each decision, the options available to
> >      Agora are ADOPTED (*), REJECTED (x), and FAILED QUORUM (!). If a
> >      decision's voting period is still ongoing, I end it immediately
> >      before resolving it and after resolving the previous decision.]
> >
> >     ID     Author(s)     AI   Title                         Pender
> >       Pend fee
> >
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >     7923x  Gaelan         1.0  Another Economy Fix Attempt  Gaelan
> >       1 AP
> >     7924*  Aris, [1]      3.0  Contracts v8                 Aris
> >       1 sh.
> >     7925*  Aris, Alexis   3.0  Safety Regulations v2        Aris
> >       1 AP
> >     7926x  Alexis         3.0  Deregulation                 Alexis
> >       1 AP
> >     7927*  V.J. Rada, G.  2.0  Estate Auction Fix           V.J. Rada
> >      1 sh.
> >     7928*  G.             3.0  no we can't                  G.
> >       1 AP
> >     7929x  V.J. Rada      1.0  Consumerism                  V.J. Rada
> >      1 sh.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >     The full text of each adopted proposal is included below.
> >
> >
> >     |        | 7923 | 7924 | 7025 | 7926 | 7927 | 7928 | 7929 |
> >     |--------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+
> >     |Alexis  | A    | P    | F    | F    | F    | F    | P    |
> >     |Aris    | A    | F    | F    | A    | F    | F    | A    |
> >     |ATMunn  | A    | F    | F    | A    | F    | F    | A    |
> >     |G       | A    | F    | F    | F    | F    | F    | A    |
> >     |nichdel | A    | F    | P    | P    | F    | F    | P    |
> >     |PSS     | A    | F    | F    | A    | F    | F    | F    |
> >     |Trigon  | F    | F    | P    | P    | P    | P    | A    |
> >     |VJ Rada | F    | F    | F    | F    | F    | F    | F    |
> >     |--------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+
> >     |F/A     | 2/6  | 7/0  | 6/0  | 3/3  | 7/0  | 7/0  | 2/4  |
> >     |AI      | 1.0  | 3.0  | 3.0  | 3.0  | 2.0  | 3.0  | 1.0  |
> >     |V       | 8    | 8    | 8    | 8    | 8    | 8    | 8    |
> >     |Q       | 5    | 5    | 5    | 5    | 5    | 5    | 5    |
> >     |P       | F    | T    | T    | F    | T    | T    | F    |
> >
> >
> >
>  //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> >     ID: 7825
> >     Title: Safety Regulations v2
> >     Adoption index: 3.0
> >     Author: Aris
> >     Co-author(s): Alexis
> >
> >
> >     Amend Rule 2493, "Regulations", by
> >
> >       * Replacing every instance of the word "instrument" with the
> >     words "textual
> >         entity"; and
> >       * Amending the second paragraph to read in full "A regulation
> >     must be
> >         authorized by at least one rule in order for it to exist. A
> >     regulation has
> >         effect on the game (only) insofar as the rule or rules that
> >     authorized it
> >         permit it to have effect. If reasonably possible, a regulation
> >     should be
> >         interpreted so as to defer to other rules. The procedure for
> >     resolving
> >         conflict between regulations is the same as it is for rules
> >     (for the
> >         purposes of resolving conflicts only, a regulation is treated
> >     as if it
> >         had the power of its least powerful parent rule)."
> >
>  //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> >     ID: 7827
> >     Title: Estate Auction Fix
> >     Adoption index: 2.0
> >     Author: V.J. Rada
> >     Co-author(s): G.
> >
> >
> >     Amend rule 2491 by replacing the text "transfer the auctioned
> >     Estate to the winner by announcement, by paying Agora the amount of
> >     the bid, or by causing the winning Organization" with "transfer the
> >     auctioned Estate to the winner by announcement and by either paying
> >     Agora the amount of the bid or causing the winning Organization"
> >
> >
>  //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> >     ID: 7828
> >     Title: no we can't
> >     Adoption index: 3.0
> >     Author: G.
> >     Co-author(s):
> >
> >
> >     Amend Rule 2125 (Regulated Actions) by replacing:
> >
> >       Restricted Actions CAN only be performed as described by the Rules.
> >
> >     with:
> >       A Restricted Action CAN only be performed as described by the
> >     Rules, and only
> >       using the methods explicitly specified in the Rules for
> >     performing the given
> >       action.
> >
> >     [this over-arching protection means in general, "by announcement"
> >     is NOT implied.  I just want to put this in place and absolutely
> >     clarify the ruleset if it passes, and we can add the MMI change later
> >     if desired].
> >
> >
>  //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> >
> >
>
>
>

Reply via email to