I support.
(Is there any real definition of what a "public document" is? It shows up everywhere in the ratification rules and it's not super clear on whether that restricts things)

On 2018-02-09 13:42, Gaelan Steele wrote:
I retract my bids of i on the zombie auctions.

I free-CFJ “were Gaelan’s bid of i on Quazie’s zombie auction still in place, 
it would have won.”

[in case we can’t retract] I intend to ratify without objection { The only bids 
made on zombie auctions between Feb 7 2018 and Feb 9 2018 were positive, real 
integers. No other other bids that were created during this time exist. }

I acknowledge that this is a ratification of a trivially false fact, but I 
believe everyone would be happier if it was true.

Gaelan

On Feb 8, 2018, at 5:48 PM, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote:

I don't want to dial 00-EVERYONE lol, and I guess that this will do. (Just
don't throw books at me lol)

I Point a Finger at G. for impersonating good faith in the game to issue a
Red Card for the purposes of a personal agenda. (via evidence of this in
their own testimony below)

I suggest Red Card, due to the employment of a Red Card itself for this
crime.

(Awkwardly, G. themselves are the Referee for this but I trust them to do
the right thing.)

I withdraw all of my Bids on all Auctions.

I then bid 5 Shinies on all Auctions.

On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 2:12 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:



Since this requires collective Agoran Consent to prosecute the Red Card
and I've said I'm staying out of that, I'm keeping out of any further
actions on this.  I won't contest anyone else's finger pointed in my
direction.

On Fri, 9 Feb 2018, Cuddle Beam wrote:
I'll retract my bids if G. cards themselves for pulling this:

    Trivial auction breaking spoils everyone's fun.  Really.  And "I
might
    as well" directly break a rule is a terrible attitude to bring to
the
    game, and doesn't Treat Agora Right.  This deserves a strong
penalty.
You were testing, I was testing... Citing the rule specifically such
that
a ruling on whether it was appropriate would be specific to cause, and
choosing a card to make it worth contesting.
I hope to believe in the future that cardings/fingerpointings from G. are
for legitimate game health reasons and not for taunting people to further
personal agendas (as interesting as the points sought may be).

On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 1:34 AM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote:

Still leaves my bid of i. I’m kind of curious about the ruling about
that,
but I’m happy to (attempt to) retract one or both of my bids if that’s
what
everyone would prefer.

Gaelan

On Feb 8, 2018, at 4:20 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu>
wrote:


On Fri, 9 Feb 2018, Madeline wrote:
So what's the status on the remaining two auctions now?
I was hoping to make a serious bid on them. :(
Here's how fun's not *entirely* broken:

You can still place lower bids.

And CuddleBeam *might* be able to retract eir bid (I think e
can, because that doesn't outright conflict with the zombie
auction rule).

Players may wish to think about making support for Throwing
the Book at CuddleBeam somehow conditional on whether e withdraws
those bids...





Reply via email to