Speaking of ratification rules, I free-CFJ on the following:
"A self-ratifying document is ratified when it is continuously undoubted
for a full Agoran week, rather than simply seven consecutive days"
Caller's Arguments:
I think the recent amendment to Rule 1023 ("Agoran Time") did this by
adding the clause that units of time given in the rules default to
Agoran unless it's clear they mean otherwise.
On 2018-02-09 13:47, Telnaior wrote:
I support.
(Is there any real definition of what a "public document" is? It shows
up everywhere in the ratification rules and it's not super clear on
whether that restricts things)
On 2018-02-09 13:42, Gaelan Steele wrote:
I retract my bids of i on the zombie auctions.
I free-CFJ “were Gaelan’s bid of i on Quazie’s zombie auction still
in place, it would have won.”
[in case we can’t retract] I intend to ratify without objection { The
only bids made on zombie auctions between Feb 7 2018 and Feb 9 2018
were positive, real integers. No other other bids that were created
during this time exist. }
I acknowledge that this is a ratification of a trivially false fact,
but I believe everyone would be happier if it was true.
Gaelan
On Feb 8, 2018, at 5:48 PM, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote:
I don't want to dial 00-EVERYONE lol, and I guess that this will do.
(Just
don't throw books at me lol)
I Point a Finger at G. for impersonating good faith in the game to
issue a
Red Card for the purposes of a personal agenda. (via evidence of
this in
their own testimony below)
I suggest Red Card, due to the employment of a Red Card itself for this
crime.
(Awkwardly, G. themselves are the Referee for this but I trust them
to do
the right thing.)
I withdraw all of my Bids on all Auctions.
I then bid 5 Shinies on all Auctions.
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 2:12 AM, Kerim Aydin
<ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
Since this requires collective Agoran Consent to prosecute the Red
Card
and I've said I'm staying out of that, I'm keeping out of any further
actions on this. I won't contest anyone else's finger pointed in my
direction.
On Fri, 9 Feb 2018, Cuddle Beam wrote:
I'll retract my bids if G. cards themselves for pulling this:
Trivial auction breaking spoils everyone's fun. Really. And "I
might
as well" directly break a rule is a terrible attitude to
bring to
the
game, and doesn't Treat Agora Right. This deserves a strong
penalty.
You were testing, I was testing... Citing the rule specifically such
that
a ruling on whether it was appropriate would be specific to
cause, and
choosing a card to make it worth contesting.
I hope to believe in the future that cardings/fingerpointings from
G. are
for legitimate game health reasons and not for taunting people to
further
personal agendas (as interesting as the points sought may be).
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 1:34 AM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com>
wrote:
Still leaves my bid of i. I’m kind of curious about the ruling about
that,
but I’m happy to (attempt to) retract one or both of my bids if
that’s
what
everyone would prefer.
Gaelan
On Feb 8, 2018, at 4:20 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu>
wrote:
On Fri, 9 Feb 2018, Madeline wrote:
So what's the status on the remaining two auctions now?
I was hoping to make a serious bid on them. :(
Here's how fun's not *entirely* broken:
You can still place lower bids.
And CuddleBeam *might* be able to retract eir bid (I think e
can, because that doesn't outright conflict with the zombie
auction rule).
Players may wish to think about making support for Throwing
the Book at CuddleBeam somehow conditional on whether e withdraws
those bids...