I call a CFJ with the below statement
"If no player activates Rule 2596 'The Ritual' in a certain week, all players who are players that week have violated the rule, which provides that (1) "Any player CAN perform The Ritual" and (2) "The Ritual MUST be performed at least once in every Agoran week." On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 4:43 AM Jason Cobb <[email protected]> wrote: > Such a CFJ does not exist, as the message calling for judgment was never > sent to a public forum. > > Jason Cobb > > On 6/4/19 4:08 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > > Your assurance that you are not committed to a certain outcome is > > enough, I think. > > > > The CFJ with the statement "If no player activates Rule 2596 'The > > Ritual' in a certain week, all players playing the game that week have > > violated the rule, which provides that (1) "Any player CAN perform The > > Ritual" and (2) "The Ritual MUST be performed at least once in every > > Agoran week." is CFJ 3730. I assign it to D. Margaux. > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 12:35 PM D Margaux <[email protected]> wrote: > >> From the beginning, this issue was always going to become a CFJ. I’m > not an interested party in the outcome, in the sense that the decision > doesn’t give me any particular benefit in the game. And the caller of the > CFJ isn’t appealing my reasoning, but instead agrees with it. > >> > >> I did give my tentative views on the subject, but I pledge to > re-evaluate the issue in good faith in light of the arguments that have > been raised if I am assigned this CFJ. I don’t have any commitment to any > particular result, except that I thought it was the correctly reasoned one, > but I remain open to being persuaded otherwise. (That’s partly why I > labeled my prior email a proto, rather than an actual decision on the > pointed finger.) > >> > -- >From V.J. Rada
