When comptrollor was proposed, frankly the main point was to
illustrate the big security hole in R106 (R106's "except as
prohibited" clause permits low-power rules to affect the operation of
high-power proposals).
This is fixed by a small addition to R2140, which places that rule's
precedence claim above R106. Thereafter (assuming I've got this
right), the comptrollor veto will only be able to affect proposals
with the power of the comptrollor rule or less (currently 1).
I submit the following proposal, "power-limit precedence", AI-3:
----------
Amend Rule 2140 (Power Controls Mutability) by replacing:
No entity with power below
with:
Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, no entity with power below
---------
