On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 10:55 AM Edward Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > > I vote as follows: > > > 8235A Jason Cobb 3.0 Unified fine creation syntax FOR > > 8236A Jason Cobb, Aris 3.0 Definition de-capitalization FOR > > 8237A Jacob Arduino, [1] 1.0 Repairing Defeated Spaceships v3 AGAINST. > > 8238A Jacob Arduino, twg, G. 3.0 Cancelling Proposals (arr. for violin) AGAINST; I still think this is way too risky. I realize that this is an unpopular opinion, but I've always been of the view that the author should have no greater influence than anyone else once the proposal has been distributed (like in parliamentary procedure).
> > 8239A Jason Cobb, [2] 1.0 The Editor (v2.0.1) AGAINST; overkill, could be done informally. > > 8240A Jason Cobb 3.0 Regulation clarification FOR > > 8241A Falsifian 3.0 Secured switches (v2.0) FOR > > 8242A Falsifian 3.0 Let the dead rest FOR > > 8248 Jason Cobb, Aris 3.0 Publishing definition FOR, this time around. Thank you for finally removing the ambiguity. > > 8249 Jacob Arduino, twg 1.0 No Harm No Foul PRESENT, unless a notice of veto has been published specifying any part of this proposal; otherwise AGAINST. -Aris
